Intralot Exit: Ohio Sports Betting Kiosks Face Major Closures

By | August 6, 2026
A sports betting kiosk with digital signage displays odds for football, basketball, and baseball. Digital screens show live sports games and betting information in the background of a dimly lit room.

Last Updated on August 6, 2026 by Craig Allen Keefner

Quick Answer

Ohio's Type-C sports betting kiosks are largely closing down by June 22, 2025, primarily because Intralot, the largest vendor in this segment, is exiting the market. This withdrawal will result in 93% of the state's Type-C sports betting kiosks, specifically 656 out of 704 active locations, going offline. After Intralot's departure, only a few locations operated by UBETOhio will remain active, dramatically reducing betting options across the state.

Type-C Sports Betting Kiosks Will Go Offline in June

From SportsBettingDime — Intralot, a key player in the sports betting market, is set to exit the Type-C sports betting sector in Ohio, which will result in a significant reduction in available kiosks for bettors.

Ohio has always been a bit of mudhole when it comes to sports betting and it seems mismanagement and bad strategy played into the deal.

One bright spot are VLTs (video lottery terminals. Excerpt:

A Fort Knox slot machine by IGT, featuring a large screen with jackpot amounts at the top and multiple colorful slot game icons on the main display—similar to sports betting kiosks Ohio players use for interactive gaming experiences.

VLT by IGT

With sports betting kiosks never reaching expectations, Ohio bar, grocery, and restaurant owners are looking to a new form of gaming. Video lottery terminals (VLTs), electronic slot machines that are currently live but illegal in Ohio, could offer a potential lifeline for small business owners in the state, Herf said.

The machines are currently illegal in Ohio, but nearly 40,000 are currently located in gaming parlors throughout the state. Several supporters of the gaming machines testified during the third hearing of Manning’s iGaming bill last week, asking the lawmaker to include legalized VLTs in his legislation and allow them to be placed in state establishments.

“I think the VLTs will work. It’s a totally different game than sports betting. You can mindlessly place a $2 bet, potentially win $100. They will work better. There are many legislators in the state that want to find a way to leverage gaming, but also help people in their districts. Unless you live in a district with a casino or racino, you’re not seeing these revenues. Every district has a bar, a bowling center, a truck stop, a convenience store where these could be. I think they want to help these types of business owners,” Herf said.

Westmeyer agreed, noting that UBETOhio has strong connections with its partners, who have all expressed strong interest in offering VLTs.

With Intralot (operating as Sports Bet Ohio) shutting down its betting kiosks in Ohio by June 22, 2025, the state’s sports betting kiosk market will be reduced dramatically. Intralot is the largest vendor in this segment and currently operates 656 of the 704 active kiosk locations, which accounts for about 93% of the total market41. Once Intralot withdraws, nearly all of Ohio’s Type-C sports betting kiosks will go offline.

After Intralot’s exit, only a few locations will remain operational, specifically those run by UBETOhio. According to UBETOhio’s CEO, the company will continue to operate its kiosks at 48 locations across the state. No other major kiosk operators are expected to remain active after Intralot’s departure, as BetSkyBox exited the market in July 20244.

What are the Key Points Regarding Ohio's Sports Betting Kiosk Shutdown?

  1. Kiosk Shutdown:

    • By June 2293% of Ohio‘s Type-C sports betting kiosks will be taken offline due to Intralot‘s decision to withdraw from this market segment.
  2. Impact on Locations:

    • This shutdown will affect most of the kiosks, which are typically located in bars and restaurants across the state, limiting betting options for many users.
  3. Regulatory Context:

    • The Ohio Bar Association has been involved in discussions regarding the implications of this move, highlighting the regulatory environment surrounding sports betting in the state.
  4. Future of Sports Betting in Ohio:

    • The article raises questions about the future of sports betting in Ohio, particularly how this kiosk reduction will affect overall betting activity and consumer access.

What is the Conclusion Regarding Ohio's Sports Betting Kiosk Changes?

The exit of Intralot from the Type-C sports betting market in Ohio marks a significant shift, with many kiosks going offline. This change could have lasting effects on the state’s sports betting landscape, prompting discussions about regulatory responses and future betting options.

Read full article From SportsBettingDime

More Sports Betting Kiosk news

Frequently Asked Questions

1 What led to the underperformance and eventual exit of Intralot from the Ohio sports betting kiosk market?

Intralot's exit from Ohio's Type-C sports betting kiosk market is attributed to the kiosks not meeting expectations, resulting in a significant reduction in availability. The article suggests "mismanagement and bad strategy" played a role in the overall challenges of sports betting in Ohio.

2 What alternative gaming technologies are being considered in Ohio following the challenges with sports betting kiosks?

Following the challenges with sports betting kiosks, Video Lottery Terminals (VLTs) are being proposed as an alternative gaming option in Ohio. Although currently illegal, supporters are advocating for their inclusion in iGaming legislation to allow placement in various small businesses across the state.

3 How do regulatory and legislative efforts impact the deployment of gaming kiosks and alternative terminals like VLTs in Ohio?

Regulatory and legislative efforts significantly impact gaming terminal deployment in Ohio, as seen with VLTs, which are currently illegal but have strong support for inclusion in iGaming legislation. This indicates that legal changes are necessary for new gaming technologies to be widely adopted in state establishments.

Author: Craig Allen Keefner

Craig Allen Keefner is an industry analyst, content strategist, and longtime authority on self-service kiosks, digital signage, unattended payment systems, and interactive technology. He manages content and industry strategy for Kiosk Industry and The Industry Group, with a focus on kiosk software, hardware-software integration, accessibility, payment compliance, healthcare kiosks, restaurant self-service, and emerging AI automation. Craig has covered the self-service and kiosk industry since the 1990s, tracking how public-facing terminals move from concept to field deployment. His work combines industry research, vendor analysis, operator conversations, standards tracking, trade show coverage, and practical experience with the real-world constraints of kiosk deployments. https://www.linkedin.com/in/kiosk